<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://forums.method.me/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Method:Classic General Q&amp;amp;A</title><link>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/13.aspx</link><description>Ask technical support questions, how do I? Questions... Or anything else you want to know from the Method Team and other Method users.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 SP2 (Build: 31113.47)</generator><item><title>Re: Table RecordId</title><link>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/1608.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:00:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3393c1ec-311b-4812-96cb-ad8c611bba4f:1608</guid><dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/1608.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=1608</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Soooo if the recordId never changes .. what happens when more records have been created over the years than possible to store in a 32 (or possibley 64 bit) value... though even 32 bit will hold up to around 4 billion in a single register, an ongoing program will eventually blow through this with daily use, if deleted recordId&amp;#39;s can never be resused.. I suppose i&amp;#39;m getting ahead of myself and away from the original question.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So in short,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks Val - that did answer my question =).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;~Joe&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Table RecordId</title><link>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/1607.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:29:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3393c1ec-311b-4812-96cb-ad8c611bba4f:1607</guid><dc:creator>Method_Valbon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/1607.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=1607</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Joe,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The record ID for a table serves as a unique identifier for that particular record and cannot be reused. Think of the record ID as a permanently bound unique ID for a newly added record.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Newly added records will always have a record ID of the last record ID generated incremented by 1. Deleting a record will permanently remove the record from the table but will not affect existing or future record IDs.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;You can easily get the number or records (count) in a table by using the &lt;em&gt;Retrieve Value from table&lt;/em&gt; for the record ID field where the record ID is greater than 0. Beside the option for &lt;em&gt;If multiple results:&lt;/em&gt; select &lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;Retrieve Count&amp;rsquo;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope that helps,&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Table RecordId</title><link>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/1603.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:47:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3393c1ec-311b-4812-96cb-ad8c611bba4f:1603</guid><dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/1603.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=1603</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When we have a table that is 5 records long,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RecordID&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Letter&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; A&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; B&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; C&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; D&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; E&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;why is it that deleting a record, such as record 4, that the record numbers do not change to say 1-4 ?.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) If&amp;nbsp; a table row four is deleted, the record numbers are listed as follows: 1,2,3,5 instead. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) Is the recordId not the&amp;nbsp; true record number from the physical table, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) or is this 4th record remaining as stored but not shown? ..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(5) I was intending to use the highest record id to indicate the number of records in the table but that doesnt seem to be a valid use anymore. For now i&amp;#39;ll look into making a count variable with the loop through table action.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thx,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Joe.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>