<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://forums.method.me/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Method:API Q&amp;A</title><link>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/15.aspx</link><description>Ask questions specific to the MethodAPI from the Method Team and other Method users.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 SP2 (Build: 31113.47)</generator><item><title>Re: SQL Query</title><link>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/26477.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:17:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3393c1ec-311b-4812-96cb-ad8c611bba4f:26477</guid><dc:creator>furrywombat</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/26477.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=15&amp;PostID=26477</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span id="mce_0_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;Oh man, I can&amp;#39;t believe I missed that. We have hundreds of linked fields... didn&amp;#39;t think to use them for this particular purpose. Thanks!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: SQL Query</title><link>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/26476.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 14:30:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3393c1ec-311b-4812-96cb-ad8c611bba4f:26476</guid><dc:creator>LaCrews</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/26476.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=15&amp;PostID=26476</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span id="mce_0_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;Furry&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;one possible solution is to flatten the table by adding the fields as method &amp;quot;linked fields&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;th&lt;span id="mce_1_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;is has worked well for us.&lt;span id="mce_2_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span id="mce_3_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Query</title><link>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/26473.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:15:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3393c1ec-311b-4812-96cb-ad8c611bba4f:26473</guid><dc:creator>furrywombat</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/26473.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=15&amp;PostID=26473</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Guys,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was wondering if it is possible for form a query with a join clause. I&amp;#39;m trying to prepare a function that seeks out transaction line entries that do not refer to any primary transaction. For most transaction lines this is easy... we just query where LinkToPrimaryTable (i.e. SalesOrder, Invoice, etc) IS NULL or = &amp;#39;&amp;#39;. But when an item receipt is converted to a bill in QuickBooks, it deletes the item receipt in Method but not the item receipt lines. Currently, we&amp;#39;re flagging these by downloading a record id list from the ItemReceipt table and looping through the ItemReceiptLine entries comparing ItemReceiptRecordID against an ItemReceipt record id array. But if there was a way to get this all done with a single query, I think it would be best.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Possible?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FW&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>