<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://forums.method.me/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Method Beta General Q &amp; A</title><link>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/26.aspx</link><description>Ask technical support questions, how do I?...or anything else you want to know from the Method Team.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 SP2 (Build: 31113.47)</generator><item><title>Re: Best Practice for App Naming Convention for Developers</title><link>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/23986.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 20:40:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3393c1ec-311b-4812-96cb-ad8c611bba4f:23986</guid><dc:creator>mahlonf</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/23986.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=26&amp;PostID=23986</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! &lt;span id="mce_3_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span id="mce_3_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;That gives me what I need&lt;span id="mce_2_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt; for now. I&amp;#39;m assuming we will be discussing that in more detail in the advanced track of the retreat.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Best Practice for App Naming Convention for Developers</title><link>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/23983.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 19:24:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3393c1ec-311b-4812-96cb-ad8c611bba4f:23983</guid><dc:creator>Method_Michael</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/23983.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=26&amp;PostID=23983</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span id="mce_0_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;Hey Mahlon-&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span id="mce_2_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span id="mce_7_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;As it stands today&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;a&lt;/span&gt;pp names have to be unique there cannot be 2 apps named routes or 2 apps named Invoices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we create an app called Routes as part of a App Pack and you already have an app in your account called Routes you will have to rename the app in your accou&lt;span id="mce_5_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;nt to install the Routes app.&lt;span id="mce_6_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span id="mce_8_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The same app can exist in multiple packs but it would just be shared by the packs it would not be a seperate version.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Best Practice for App Naming Convention for Developers</title><link>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/23959.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 09:39:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3393c1ec-311b-4812-96cb-ad8c611bba4f:23959</guid><dc:creator>mahlonf</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/thread/23959.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.method.me/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=26&amp;PostID=23959</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I realize this may be a more advanced question&lt;span id="mce_24_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, bu&lt;span id="mce_23_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;t I thought I&amp;#39;d throw it out&lt;span id="mce_6_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;...&lt;span id="mce_25_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span id="mce_6_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;What happens if down the road I create a Method Pack&lt;span id="mce_4_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt; for an industry specific need&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span id="mce_3_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;...assuming we can do that...&lt;span id="mce_7_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;call&amp;nbsp;&lt;span id="mce_8_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;Sales&lt;span id="mce_9_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;W&amp;uuml;rks for example.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;Within the pack is an app called Routes&lt;span id="mce_11_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;The&lt;span id="mce_12_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;n&lt;/span&gt; the client&lt;span id="mce_13_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt; decides to install another pack that also has an app called Routes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would this create a conflict...? If so, as developers,&lt;span id="mce_14_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span id="mce_17_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span id="mce_19_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;what is the best practice for naming conventions to distinguish our apps from apps that may be installed from other developers&lt;span id="mce_26_start" style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="overflow:hidden;"&gt;Thanks!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>