Method Community

Seny - A tip for you.  You'll see in some of the apps where we use a selection list, we'll do something like: 1. Set resultSelectionList to "-99" in the first action of "Assign Value to Action Result". 2. Start Loop Through Table. 3. Character Function, "Join with Comma" ...

That's what I thought. As long as I know it will cause a split, I will just make sure that there are no commas before join another one. Thanks.

Seny - it's going to do a simple "split" function in the backend to turn it into an array.  So your extra comma will just cause an extra selection list value.  It's very basic - so hopefully this is what you need. Hope that helps, Paul

Thanks, btw, does it matter if in one of my values there is already a comma?

Seny - use a Character function, and "Join with Comma".  Paul

I know I could use a shared result, however, my question was how do I build the list? which means that I will have a list of values need to be stroed in the shared result, so how do I "Join" multiple values into a Shared Result, so that later on when I use it, it will looks like a list in stead of a long string? Thanks.

 Hi Emsegal, It seems you are an MSP since you do demonstrations. If you are an MSP then please contact Danny Do Couto about a possible reset. Also, there is a dedicated MSP forum, to access it please use the following link: http://www.methodintegration.com/cs/forums/17.aspx

 Hey Emsegal, You can either try to re-generate the table, or you can contact your business consultant and we will look into this for you. If you want to regenerate the table, follow the steps below. First confirm the dropdown is assigned a table, do this buy editing the screen and looking into the properties of the dropdown in question. If ...

 Hi Seny, You can create a Shared Result on any screen by using the action 'Assign Value to Shared Result'. Here you'll specify the value of the shared result and you'll assign a name. When you set up the grid filter, you'll use the Shared Result name you specified. The good thing about using Shared Result, is that you ...

 The default behaviour is apparently to put the contact's name in to the Customer Name field, even if there is a company name in Outlook. There should be some logic to have the Customer Name be the Outlook contact's name only if the Outlook company name field is Null, otherwise the Customer Name should be the value from the Outlook ...